Facebook defenders: Is it really OK to mess with people’s heads?

I have a couple of questions for anyone defending the ethics of Facebook’s recent “emotional contagion” experiment on nearly 700,000 unsuspecting users: would it be OK to mess with the heads of your closest friends and relatives — your children, even — without their knowledge?

If you say yes, what if a few of those friends and relatives suffered from chronic depression? What if one or two of those are suicidal? Is it still OK to tweak their Facebook news feeds so they get more bad news than good, to see how that might make them feel?

The Facebook researchers did exactly that. Now think about these statistics from the National Institute of Mental Health:

In other words, of the 689,003 Facebook users who were unwitting guinea pigs in the emotional contagion experiment, it’s likely that more than 46,000 were already suffering from depression … with almost 14,000 of them having severe symptoms. Even assuming half of those received the positive news feeds as opposed to the negative ones, that’s 23,000 people with depression — including 7,000 severely depressed people — who were used as test subjects without their knowledge or approval to see if bad news would make them feel even worse.

That’s more than unethical. It’s venturing into a minefield with both legal and moral implications. And it’s truly frightening that some people think that’s absolutely OK.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s